About Me

Name:Dan@Minuteman1
Email: minuteman1blog@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

The TRUE meaning of Independence Day

Click Image to Enlarge
What follows is a portion of the speech given by President Calvin Coolidge the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1926. It is particularly relevant to us today, if for no other reason than the challenge that confronts us in the person of Barack Obama and others who wish to advance their progressive dogma and while in the process pass themselves off as those who possess a higher wisdom.

About the Declaration there is a finality that is exceedingly restful. It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning can not be applied to this great charter. If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers.
 
There are, today, many who are far too quick in wishing to alter, demean or propose changing what it is these great men accomplished.  My God!  What right have they to attempt to make better something that has lasted over 200 years.  How arrogant!  We simply cannot allow those who wish to alter that which has made this country great to succeed.  For if we do we are sowing the seeds of our own downfall!
Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama begins his slow move to the right

It would appear that Obama is beginning his slow drift to right attempting to portray himself as something other than the left wing Socialist that he really is. I guess he figures all them thar red necks that go to NASCAR races, are pro-life and want to see us win in Iraq won’t be smart enough to see through his little charade. This guy is obviously nothing but an elitist who thinks he is just so darn much smarter than the rest of us poor country folk. I guess he figures we’ll just be in such awe that we’ll be more than happy to believe everything he tells us. BUNK! Sorry there Obama! But the morons are all on the same side of the issues that you’re on and that you’ve advocated your whole life.

News that Barack Obama has changed his mind, and is rejecting at least some of the extremism of NARAL, Emily's List, and other radical abortion organizations are starting to creep into some mainstream news outlets.

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama says "mental distress" should not qualify as a health exception for late term-abortions, a key distinction not embraced by many supporters of abortion rights.
In an interview this week with "Relevant," a Christian magazine, Obama said prohibitions on late-term abortions must contain "a strict, well defined exception for the health of the mother.  "Obama then added: "Now, I don't think that 'mental distress' qualifies as the health of the mother. I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy, where there are real, significant problems to the mother carrying that child to term."

Also, when it comes to his Iraq policy, Obama may now be softening:

Senator Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot sustain a long-term military presence in Iraq, but added that he would be open to "refine my policies" about a timeline for withdrawing troops after meeting with American military commanders during a trip to Iraq later this month.

Mr. Obama, whose popularity in the Democratic primary was built upon a sharp opposition to the war and an often-touted 16-month gradual timetable for removing combat troops, dismissed suggestions that he was changing positions in the wake of reductions in violence in Iraq and a general election fight with Senator John McCain.

"I've always said that the pace of withdrawal would be dictated by the safety and security of our troops and the need to maintain stability. That assessment has not changed," he said. "And when I go to Iraq and have a chance to talk to some of the commanders on the ground, I'm sure I'll have more information and will continue to refine my policies." 

Obama May Campaign at NASCAR Races

Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) in the coming weeks may become the first Democratic presidential nominee to attend a NASCAR stock car race in 16 years, his campaign confirmed today.

"We would love to make it to a NASCAR race if the schedule permits," Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki told Roll Call Thursday afternoon. "In the meantime, we plan to continue campaigning in communities across the country including small towns and rural communities where people are dissatisfied with the leadership of the last eight years and looking for a new direction for the country."

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What would our Founders say?

Don't mess with these guys.
If they are truly looking down on us from above on this Fourth of July, what might our Founding Fathers be thinking as they watch the goings on in not only the run up to this next election, but in seeing how we’ve managed to bastardize their idea of limited government. Would they be shaking their heads as they watch as we consider actually electing an unabashed socialist as President? A man who wants to grow the size of government at an accelerated rate? Could it be they’re saying, "Well, at least we got them a couple of hundred years?"

Does it seem odd to anyone but me, that while many in Europe are electing more conservative governments, we seem to be hell bent on going 180 degrees in the other direction? Socialism is an idea that should be relegated to the past. It has shown itself to be unworkable and an economic nightmare time after time. And yet, the morons among us still buy into the utopian fantasy that it will supposedly create. Face it folks, you’re only going to have more and you’re willing to work for it and you’re willing to vote for politicians who want to take less of it!

Somewhere along the way the principles on which the Founders based the foundation of their idea regarding what powers the government should have, have morphed into something I doubt very much that they would even be able to recognize. Because over time those great ideas have been pushed aside in favor of a more collective, nonsensical idea of government that actually reduces individual freedoms for all but the elitists of this country. I simply cannot understand those in this country who continually defend the warped policies of the left. Peddling the socialist propaganda regarding what this country is and what it stands for, now and throughout our history. I don’t understand what it is they hope to gain by tearing down their own country to the point where they seem so willing to even make up and spread outrageous lies for no other reason than to denigrate their country. When you have certifiable nut jobs out there like Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and until his death Edward Said, acting in conjunction with any number of washed up Hollywood types and nutty professors, all spewing nothing but pure hatred for our way of life, it has to have an impact on the less intelligent out there among us. There are possibly millions of ignorant people who actually believe the tripe advocated by these anti-American leftists. I truly worry about what the future holds in store for our country when men like these can command the large audiences that they do.

Men like Chomsky, Zinn and Said supported, and continue to support the idea of the utopian experience that was the old Soviet Union and still is in Communist Cuba. Based on such obviously loony opinions such as these, how do these men acquire such a huge following? And how have we allowed ourselves to be maneuvered into a position where our society has an ever increasing number of people who seem perfectly content to permit the government to take more and more from those among us willing to work hard. Only so that it turn around and give more and more to those who are unwilling to work just as hard as the other folks, or, to work at all? We have been hoodwinked into allowing the government to venture into areas never intended by the Founders and we are paying the price in higher taxes and a decreased return on those very same too high taxes. Who’s to blame? Well if we didn’t elect those pushing for increasing the government’s reach, it wouldn’t be able to reach so far into our pockets. So, it would appear that we’re our own worst enemy.

If we are ever to return this country to what it was the Founders envisioned for it and for us, we’ve got some tough decisions and some hard choices to make. But on the other hand, if we’re all happy and content with a government that seems to get a little bigger with each passing year, while taking more of our hard earned money, then we can continue to sit back and do nothing. The Founder’s vision was to put in place a government with limited powers, not the all encompassing leviathan that we have today. The more power we allow the government to possess, the fewer freedoms we the people will have. I only hope that when that little light bulb goes off for people it won’t be too late. If it’s not too late already.

 

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »